Holy f***ing s***t – I was just in a plane crash!

Not my words, but those of one Mike Wilson, as he records his brush with death on Twitter. His message, sent via mobile after his Continental Airlines flight skidded off the runway at Denver Airport, seems to have been more widely reported than the crash itself, and is being held up as evidence that the tide of news reporting is in some ways turning. This use of Twitter follows its widespread use during the Mumbai terror attacks, to bring front line experiences to a worldwide audience before conventional news outlets.

In the case of the Denver crash, it is significant that first comment on the crash did not come from a spokesperson for the airport or the airline but straight from a member of the public via the increasingly reported microblogging site. Indeed Loic Le Meur comments that when a Continental Airlines spokesperson was questioned on CNN, he had few answers for reporters (annoyingly I can't find this footage on Youtube).

Public relations practitioners will need to adapt to this new form of news reporting by recognising the need for greater transparency, accuracy and speed in their interactions with the media. Also key in this new reporting environment will be the need for swifter resolution of issues as they occur on the ground.

Of course, when it comes to relatively unmediated content like Twitter, there are obviously issues of trust and professionalism. There are no codes of conduct and no formal professional standards because everyone who posts on Twitter is doing so in an amateur capacity (to illustrate, have a look at the photo above, taken on the scene by Mr Wilson - not amazing is it?). For this reason Twitter is unlikely to replace traditional news outlets any time soon .

However, noone is really talking about one type of reporting replacing another. The most exciting opportunities lie in rich, multi-layered content, and the relationship between user generated and traditional news agency content should be complementary. Along these lines, Dan Thornton over at 140Char.com, makes the case for news websites to integrate microblogging into their reporting of stories - something I personally find a very exciting prospect.

Is news fine as it is, or could it benefit from more interactivity? Would you trust a member of the public to bring you front line news or would you rather wait to get it from a journalist?